b. 1
|
composition: Op. 25 No 6, Etude in G♯ minor
..
In the main text we give the title and dedication after the title page of the entire opus in FC and FE. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Dedications , GE revisions |
||||||||||||||||
b. 1
|
composition: Op. 25 No 6, Etude in G♯ minor
..
The use of time signature surprises only in GE1, as FE did not use the indication in the Etudes – contrary to the manuscripts – even once, neither in Op. 25 nor in Op. 10 and the Etude in F minor, Dbop. 36 No. 1 (cf. also the Impromptu in A major, Op. 29). In any case, the correctness and authenticity of the time signature is undeniable with respect to the compatible version of FC and EE. The correct time signature was returned in GE2 (→GE3). category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Changes of metre , Inaccuracies in GE , Inaccuracies in FE , GE revisions , 4/4 or 2/2 |
||||||||||||||||
b. 2-3
|
composition: Op. 25 No 6, Etude in G♯ minor
..
In FC the part of the R.H. is written in these bars in an abbreviated manner – with the help of •/• signs – as repetition of bar 1. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Abbreviated notation of A |
||||||||||||||||
b. 4
|
composition: Op. 25 No 6, Etude in G♯ minor
..
In FC, the 2nd, 3rd and 4th group of semiquavers are written in an abbreviated manner as repetition of the first. This notation – certainly drawn from [A] – undoubtedly means repetition of genuine pitch of the sounds from the 1st group and not of the notes themselves without accidentals, which was initially not understood in any of the first editions (FE, EE1, GE1). The necessary sharps, single and double, were added only in EE2 (→EE3) and GE2 (→GE3). category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Abbreviated notation of A |
||||||||||||||||
b. 4
|
composition: Op. 25 No 6, Etude in G♯ minor
..
FE, EE1 and GE1 misinterpreted the abbreviated notation of FC and of the remaining Stichvorlage manuscripts, giving the 2nd, 3rd and 4th groups of semiquavers without any accidentals. The mistake was corrected in EE2 (→EE3) and GE2 (→GE3). Similarly in almost all analogous places – cf. bars 8, 20 and 36, as well as 12 and 40. category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Errors in FE , Errors in EE , Omissions to cancel alteration , Errors in GE , GE revisions , Inaccuracies in FC |